| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Cadder ruling ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Cadder v HM Advocate
''Cadder v HM Advocate'' () UKSC 43 (26 October 2010) is a decision in which the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom held that the way in which police in Scotland detained suspects was not compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights and was therefore unlawful in terms of the Scotland Act 1998.
==Facts==
Peter Cadder was convicted at Glasgow Sheriff Court of assault and breach of the peace on 29 May 2009,〔(Judgement of the Supreme Court ) at paragraph 5〕 following an incident in May 2007.〔(Judgement of the Supreme Court ) at paragraph 7〕
Cadder had been detained under section 14(1) of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 and interviewed by two officers from Strathclyde Police at London Road Police Office in Glasgow. In August 2008 an identity parade was held at which the complainer, John Tacey, was unable to identify anyone.〔(Judgement of the Supreme Court ) at paragraph 6〕 In the subsequent court case the Crown relied upon evidence obtained within Cadder's police interview to help to prove their case.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Cadder v HM Advocate」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|